Compliance — GDPR

Continuous pentests
for GDPR Article 32.

Article 32 requires regularly testing the effectiveness of your technical security measures. Autonomous agents pentest continuously, prove what exposes personal data, and produce the evidence — without replacing your legal or privacy program.

  • Article 32(1)(d) testing
  • Proven, not scanned
  • Retested and dated
Talk to usSee how it works
Integrate everything from your surface
  • AWS
  • Google Cloud
  • Azure
  • Cloudflare
  • GitHub
  • GitLab
  • Bitbucket
How it maps

The testing Article 32 wants,
and the proof it leaves.

Art. 32(1)(d)

Regular testing

A process for regularly testing and evaluating the effectiveness of your technical measures — run continuously, not once a year.

Proven exposure

Where data can leak

Every finding shows the exact request that reached personal data it should not, not a scanner's guess that it might.

Remediation

Closed and linked

Fixes land through your own coding agent over MCP, and each one is linked to the finding it closes.

Evidence

For your DPO

Export findings, remediation status and dated retest verdicts for your DPO, your controllers and your Article 30 records.

Beyond the pentest

The pentest is one measure. Your subprocessor map is another.

Article 28 makes you accountable for where personal data flows and who processes it. Superhack discovers your estate from the outside and maps every host to the provider and vendor behind it, so the processors and subprocessors in scope are a live map rather than a spreadsheet updated once a year.

Attack surface map

Your company, from the outside
AWS eu-west-1168 assets
Vercel96 assets
Cloudflare41 assets
Auth06 assets
Stripe9 assets
Datadog14 assets
Sentry4 assets
Heroku35 assets
Customer API42 assets
2api.acme.com
4api-eu.acme.com
gw.acme.com
events.acme.com
webhooks.acme.com
sandbox.acme.com
docs-api.acme.com
status.acme.com
Acquired estate26 assets
3sso.oldco.net
1vpn.oldco.net
2jira.oldco.net
wiki.oldco.net
mail.oldco.net
ftp.oldco.net
git.oldco.net
old-cdn.oldco.net
1
Payments18 assets
9
Internal tooling51 assets
3
Web application87 assets
Edge and DNS41 assets
1
Identity tenant6 assets
Billing9 assets
2
Observability14 assets
1
Error tracking4 assets
2
Legacy DNS9 assets
Critical findingsHigh findingsObserved relationshipReachable, not provenProven crossing
Why continuous

A once-a-year pentest ages fast.
The evidence has to stay true.

Capability
Pentest
annual engagement
Scanner
Burp · Nessus
Superhack
this thing
Continuous coverage
Once a year
Always-on
Continuous + on-demand
Full-scope, agent-deep
A sample of your stack
Surface only
Every endpoint, every path
Real exploitation
Bounded by human time
Pattern matching
End-to-end chains
Runnable proof of exploit
“Likely exploitable”
CVE / signature match
curl + Playwright pack
Zero false positives
Low (manual review)
High noise
Replayed before delivery
Same-day results
3+ months
Real-time, noisy
First critical inside hours
No per-engagement billing
$50–100k per engagement
Flat annual subscription
Free during early access
The evidence pack

Everything your auditor asks for. Assembled as the testing happens.

  • Every finding, with the requests and the exploit path that proved it
  • Severity, affected asset, and the boundary that was crossed
  • Remediation status, linked to the change that closed it
  • A dated retest verdict showing the exploit no longer reproduces
  • A timeline of agent activity across the testing window
  • Scope, rate limits and the identities testing ran as
For your Article 32 evidence

Get the testing
Article 32 asks for.

Point agents at your product and see exactly where personal data can be reached — findings that arrive proven, fixes that are verified, and a record of testing that stays current rather than a once-a-year snapshot.

Talk to us
Evidence
Audit-ready
Testing
Continuous
Findings
Proven
Retests
Dated
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about GDPR security evidence with Superhack.